I have been a dedicated Cascadia convert since whatever
edition was around in 2008, when Sage to Summit’s Brooks rep handed me a pair
and said something to the effect of, “Give these babies a try. I think you’ll
like ‘em.” He was wrong. I didn’t like them…I loved them. My love of the
Cascadias seemed to grow stronger with each year’s new version; then, the
Cascadia 8 came out last year and the feet of my heart began to wander. The 8
was still a solid shoe, but, at least for me, the fit was just “off,” the
cushion wasn’t all there and the ride wasn’t as smooth. I found myself checking
out other shoes, wearing out other shoes even. My relationship with the
Cascadias seemed to be on the rocks and I could barely stand the thought of
jumping feet first into the “go-to” running shoe dating pool again. Fortunately, after 3 days and 65+ miles of varied terrain in the 9
th
and latest edition I can confidently say to the Cascadia that, once again, I am
emotionally yours.
If that sounded melodramatic, well, maybe, but the reality
is that every runner wants, heck needs, to have a “go-to” shoe they can rely on
without question or doubt. My quiver of shoes is broad and diverse, and many of
them I really enjoy logging miles in, but none quite as much as the Cascadia.
Why? Read on…
First off, for those that loved the
Cascadia 7, but loved
the Cascadia 8 not-so-much, the Cascadia 9 feels very much like a throwback to
the 7. It is well-cushioned, has a very smooth ride, and the fit is more in
tune with previous models (The 8 for many was a bit long in their normal size
and considerably more voluminous, making dialing in the size an issue. Also,
for some the 8 felt “flat” and lacking in the super-smooth ride the Cascadia is
known for.). If anything the
Cascadia 9 went a bit too narrow in the forefoot.
In the area of the forefoot pivot posts I developed irritated spots on the lateral
sides of my feet that eventually developed into small blisters. Of course, this
occurred during back-to-back out of the box long runs of 25 & 24 miles in
unusually dry and warm “winter” conditions. Two days later, with a minor
loosening of the laces and a slightly thinner sock, I went out for a 17 miler
with a healthy dose of vert and had no further issues. So, for what it’s worth,
just be aware that the fit is on the narrow side. For me, it has done nothing
to diminish my excitement about the shoe.
My excitability about this shoe stems from its comfort, ride
and versatility. With its bomber-grippy, aggressively-lugged outsole, forefoot
rockplate, protective toecap and neutral-yet-stable platform the Cascadia 9 is
meant for the steepest, most rugged trails and cross country, peak bagging
terrain you can find, but because it is so well-cushioned and has such a smooth
heel-to-toe transition the 9 feels equally at home on groomed dirt roads and
trails, and even asphalt, making it a hybrid shoe of sorts although it isn’t
marketed as such. On the aforementioned 17 miler the Cascadia 9 felt equally
awesome when I was grinding out 16 minute miles on a super-steep ascent,
tap-dancing back down the rocky singletrack and opening it up at the end on
rolling dirt roads with some sub-7s.
In wet conditions the mesh upper drains well, and when it
really gets sloppy and muddy, the snow begins to fly, or you find yourself
crossing a slippery, lingering snowfield during a Sierra summer run the outsole
traction will keep you upright and confident. The upper on the 9 continues the
trend of mostly welded overlays and this upper seems to be a bit more
reinforced on the lateral and medial sides enhancing the structural integrity
and dishing up a more snug, stable glove-like fit.
Despite the fact that the Cascadia is a neutral shoe with a
more traditional heel-to-toe drop (I have heard that it is slightly lower,
probably in the 8-10mm range, in the 9th version compared with
previous ones, but I couldn’t find info on the exact numbers.) it somehow
delivers a low profile feel and it is rock solid stable, thanks in part to the
4-point pivot post system that mimics a vehicle’s suspension. When I plan on
hammering down a technical and/or steep trail, this is the shoe I want on my
feet for maximum confidence.
The Cascadia 9 is not particularly light by today’s trail
shoe standards, weighing in at just under 12oz, but light is not always right
or better, and this shoe simply never feels like too much of a good thing.
If I had to sum up the Cascadia 9 in one sentence it would
be this: if I could only have a quiver of one for 2014, as of now, this would
be the shoe. It feels good to be able to say that again about the Cascadia. But
I won’t go so far as to buy it flowers. I’ll save the flora for my girlfriend
and take the Cascadia 9s out on a multi-day running and hiking trip in the
Sierra this summer. Oh, did I not mention that these make excellent fastpacking
shoes? Because they do. Versatility, remember?
Features:
- 11.7oz (mens)/9.7oz (womens)
- Slightly lower heel than previous
Cascadias
- Forefoot rock shield
- Heel & forefoot pivot posting
system
- Seamless upper with welded
overlays
- Aggressively-lugged, grippy
outsole
Please comment on the post if you have any questions about the Cascadia 9, or feel free to email me directly at jeff@sagetosummit.com.
|
Brooks Cascadia 9: Just out of the box, ready for a test run. |
|
Brooks Cascadia 9: Checking out the mountains that it will cruise around. |
|
Cascadia 9 with 50 miles on them. |